Are there published studies that show similar or dissimilar trends that should be discussed?.Has similar work already been published without the authors acknowledging this?.Is the research replicable, reproducible, and robust? Does it follow best practice and meet ethical standards?.If experimental design features prominently in the paper, is the methodology sound?.Upon closer readings, the reviewer will be looking for any major issues: Are the key messages short, accurate and clear?.Does the paper follow a clear and organized structure?.Do the keywords accurately reflect the content?.Does the abstract provide an accessible summary of the paper?.Does the title properly reflect the subject of the paper?.Is the argument well-constructed and clear? Are there any factual errors or invalid arguments?.If the paper includes tables or figures, what do they add to the paper? Do they aid understanding or are they superfluous?.If the author is disagreeing significantly with the current academic consensus, do they have a substantial case? If not, what would be required to make their case credible?.Are the conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presented? Do they address the main question posed?.Is the paper well written? Is the text clear and easy to read?.
How original is the topic? What does it add to the subject area compared with other published material?.What is the main question addressed by the research? Is it relevant and interesting?.They will be asking themselves the following questions: In general, at first read-through reviewers will be assessing your argument’s construction, the clarity of the language, and content. Originality, scientific significance, conciseness, precision, and completeness Click here to read Wiley’s review confidentiality policy and check the review model for each journal we publish. The length of the peer review process varies by journal, so check with the editors or the staff of the journal to which you are submitting to for details of the process for that particular journal. Learn about our Transparent Peer Review pilot in collaboration with Publons and ScholarOne (part of Clarivate, Web of Science). There are many forms of peer review, from traditional models like single-blind and double-blind review to newer models, such as open and transferable review. Reviewers will evaluate the originality and thoroughness of your work, and whether it is within scope for the journal you have submitted to. Your work is shared with experts in your field of study in order to gain their insight and suggestions. Take courses to build your skills and understanding, including our course on peer review and responding to reviewer comments. This online, on-demand learning program guides you through the publishing process. You want your work to be the best it can possibly be, and that’s where peer review comes in.